Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Ethical Issues of Unilever

Unilever
Unilever has become a leading global manufacturer of packaged consumer goods. It operates in most of the sectors of the economy including food, home, and personal care. They own over 400 brands with eleven of them having global annual revenues of more than $1 billion. Brands include: Knorr, Surf, Lipton, Omo, Sunsilk, Dove, Blue Band, Lux, Hellmann’s, Becel, the Heartbrand logo, Axe, Ben and Jerry’s, Slim-Fast, Klondike, Vaseline, Ragu, and others.


The Dove and Axe Case
Dove:
Dove produces beauty products mainly for women. Dove became the world’s number one cleansing brand. They achieved this success through a marketing campaign known as “The Campaign for Real Beauty.” They say “Dove’s mission is to make more women feel beautiful every day by broadening the narrow definition of beauty and inspiring them to take great care of themselves.”

Axe:
Axe provides grooming products mainly for the young male consumer. Unilever launched this brand back in 1983 in France. Axe markets itself to younger men by sending the message that if you use Axe, more women will become attracted to you. “Wearing Axe will lead to the ultimate male fantasies. The company places ads in such media outlets as Maxim and FHM, which target primarily young-male audiences.


Unilever Issue:
Dove and Axe do very well using completely different marketing strategies, but these strategies actually contradict each other in the message they send and Unilever owns both of these companies. Unilever's website boasts that they are a company with brands that "help people feel good, look good and get more out of life." Consumers see this value continued through the Dove brand with their "Real Beauty Campaign" but  the lines get a little blurred when it comes to Axe. While Dove is passing along their message of positive self image for women, Axe is releasing an add stating “The Cleaner you are, the dirtier you get.” In the Axe ads the women are all skinny and beautiful, which consumers believe are reinforcing the negative stereotypes about women. While in the Dove ads women are encouraged to love themselves no matter what their body looks like. On the other hand Axe is standing for everything that Dove is trying to rid the world of. Consumers wonder how it is possible that Unilever, a company whose mission is to make people feel and look good, is letting Axe get away with ads that belittle and degrade women.


Unilever Response:
Unilever has responded to these allegations by saying that both companies values do fit with the companies central goal. They believe that while Dove is making women feel better about themselves, Axe is doing the same thing for young men. With the help of Axe and their ads, the company is trying to help young men feel less awkward about the changes that are occurring in their bodies. They believe that both brands are continuing the companies main goal, they're just doing it in different ways.

Unilever continues to let Axe and Dove send customer mixed messages, because both of these brands make the company a lot of money.  With sales that high it is obvious to Unilever that both advertising techniques are working to maximize their profit, therefore should not be changed as they are not breaking any laws.

Society Response:
There is a large group of people who are not happy with the use of advertisements within Unilever. The stakeholders that are negatively effected by these ads are all women who purchase either product, any woman who sees the ads, or any woman who has a negative body image. There is a large part of the population that is being made unhappy because of the ads. In this case all woman are involved in the business, because Axe is advertising negative stereotypes for the whole gender by
selling feminine self-empowerment to girls and anti-feminine self-empowerment to boys. They are building it up and breaking it down at the same time, so that they can make money.

35 comments:

  1. This content is really good and it very helpful information to understand the issues relating in this company and also knowing different response of Unilever.
    Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The description of all the elements are emperical and genuine to acknowledge the issues which goes on various departments of a company.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a great example how companies use advertisement to sell their products by negative advertisement

    ReplyDelete
  4. Had a good time perusing over the case study.
    The information doctrined in the case and about the case moreover is well written and pretty vivid for everyone to comprehend.
    Good Work

    ReplyDelete
  5. very informative article, i too strongly believe that the point deciphered in the article that "the more bussiness mindset a person has the little he will care for people" is very rightly 

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is best example how companies use advertisement for sell their products by negative add.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Actually this is the perfect example for the brand company for their exclent qualitiy products.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's sad how a company can do so wrong

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They can do so because they only want to maximize their profit.

      Delete
  9. I truly agree in act of doing business people nowadays forget about human welfare and just focus on their own profit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They forgot about human welfare as they believe that both brands are continuing the companies main goal, they're just doing it in different ways. And it should not be changed as they are not breaking any laws.

      Delete
  10. I think they are ethically right as they are advertising without breaking any laws

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes we can say they are ethically right as they are not breaking any laws and also they were named world's most ethical company back in 2009.

      Delete
  11. It shows us how a reputed company like Uniliver is playing with society only to gain profit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unilever is playing with society (especially women) by using Dove ads to encourag women to love themselves no matter what their body looks like. On the other hand they use Axe to stand for everything that Dove is trying to rid the world of.

      Delete
  12. By using Dove they are incouraging women on the other hand they discourage them through Axe.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it makes women feel sad who purchase either product or any woman who sees the ads or any woman who has a negative body image.

      Delete
  13. I truly agree in doing a business in act of “Wearing Axe will lead to the ultimate male fantasies. The company places ads in such media outlets as Maxim and FHM, which target primarily young-male audiences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes as they are doing it for all young men's as they feel less awkward about the changes that are occurring in their bodies.

      Delete
  14. Here i came to the pionts were Axe is advertising negative stereotypes for the whole gender by
    selling feminine self-empowerment to girls and anti-feminine self-empowerment to boys. They are building it up and breaking it down at the same time, so that they can make money.Dont you think they should also care about the emotion of other person instead of caring about money?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, they have to take care about emotion of other people. Such advertisement makes other sad, especially women.

      Delete
  15. Is Unilever an ethical company as they are encouraging women with Dove and discouraging them with Axe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unilever was named the world’s most ethical company in 2009. Unilever’s website explains, “According to the judges, Unilever earned a coveted place on the list by going beyond legal minimums, introducing innovative ideas to benefit the public and forcing its competitors to follow suit by raising the bar on what it takes to be an ethical leader.” Unilever has been a true standout in the industry proving good practices result in a good image.

      Delete
  16. This blog helped me know about the advertisement technique used ethically for positioning the brand on customer's end!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are using both advertising strategies and are doing it under the law.

      Delete
  17. Productive and fun work space. Its a nice place to work and a employee can maintain work life balance easily. Unilever takes care of its employees very well

    ReplyDelete
  18. You're content is really good so what you think, is dove axe and other product damage his business can you ellabrate...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, they are not damaging the business. Even they are gaining profit and also dove axe and some other products are having global annual revenues of more than $1 billion.

      Delete
  19. Most of branding of a product is dependents on advertisement. So, it Should be made accordingly.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Are they gaining more profit by using both types of advertising strategies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, they are gaining more and more profit even using both advertising strategies. Both are having global annual revenues of more than $1 billion.

      Delete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. So instead of people's health all they need is profit

    ReplyDelete
  23. According to me Axe only try to make young men feel better so they are not doing anything wrong

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Axe try to make young men feel good, but in the Axe ads the women are all skinny and beautiful, which are reinforcing the negative stereotypes about women.

      Delete